|
|
||||||||
F. Kimura and T. Funabashi are in the Dept. of Physiology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
-aminobutyric acid neurons. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Classical model for the neural control mechanism of LH secretion in rats |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Discovery of the GnRH pulse generator in rhesus monkeys |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| The GnRH pulse generator in rats |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since then, features of the neuronal mechanism responsible for the pulsatile LH secretion have been intensively studied. The dependence of the pulsatile LH secretion on brain catecholamine was once the subject of much interest. However, the early finding that this mechanism is naloxone sensitive in rats may be more important. Naloxone, an opiate antagonist that binds with a higher affinity to µ-receptors than to other binding sites, was found to increase LH pulse frequency and amplitude in either intact or ovariectomized rats (1, 11, 13). There is now general agreement that endogenous opioids mediate the effect of estrogen, which is inhibitory to pulsatile LH secretion (negative feedback effect of estrogen) (11). Such a function of endogenous opioid peptides is consonant with the fact that amenorrhea and sterility often accompany morphine addiction in human females.
The next object of keen interest was whether the GnRH pulse generator, possibly present in the MBH as mentioned above, could produce the GnRH surge in rats, since it was reported in 1976 that, in rats, the preovulatory LH surge was preceded by a surge of GnRH secretion into the portal vessel, which was not seen at other stages (15). A hypothesis was presented by Kalra and colleagues (11) about a decade ago and since then has dominated investigators in this field: the GnRH pulse generator is stimulated by an abrupt decrease in the inhibitory opioid tone occurring during the afternoon of proestrus. This hypothesis was based on their finding that naloxone infusion in the morning of proestrus prematurely evoked a surgelike LH secretion, which, in terms of amplitude and duration, resembled preovulatory LH surge in the afternoon of proestrus. In addition, when naloxone was implanted directly into the POA or the MBH, LH secretion was rapidly stimulated, but not when implanted into other forebrain regions, in ovariectomized rats experimentally conditioned by estrogen and progesterone to secrete LH in the surge mode (see Ref. 10). It was therefore argued that opioid neurons that reside in the POA are interposed between the biological clock and GnRH neurons and that in the proestrus afternoon the biological clock restrains the inhibitory opioid influence on the GnRH pulse generator.
| Electrophysiological approach to the GnRH pulse generator in rats |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By means of this technique, we tested in long-term ovariectomized rats the response of the GnRH pulse generator to naloxone (see Ref. 13). Naloxone clearly increased the frequency of volleys in the MUA, supporting the hypothesis that endogenous opioids inhibit the activity of the GnRH pulse generator tonically (11). However, probably due to the desensitization or downregulation by GnRH released in a large amount, the serum LH level did not increase significantly. This electrophysiological study disclosed the effect of naloxone on the GnRH pulse generator directly but not indirectly through its effect on serum LH (see Ref. 13).
In subsequent experiments, we found that the administration of estrogen to ovariectomized rats decreased the frequency of MUA volleys and that the injection of naloxone into such estrogen-treated ovariectomized rats increased the frequency of volleys (see Ref. 13), together supporting the previous view that endogenous opioids mediate the negative feedback effect of estrogen on LH secretion in rats (see review, Ref. 3).
| Evidence that the GnRH pulse generator is not involved in the LH surge in rats |
|---|
|
|
|---|
First and foremost, it was confirmed that the GnRH pulse generator activity was resistant to barbiturates (4, 13). This feature should have been noticed more than 10 years ago when the MUA volleys as well as LH pulses were first discovered under the continuous infusion of thiopental sodium in experiments to establish the recording technique (12). Very recently, we especially confirmed that MUA volleys and LH pulses were not substantially affected by anesthesia with pentobarbital sodium in ovariectomized rats either with or without estrogen treatment (see Ref. 13).
Second, we observed that the GnRH pulse generator activity was not facilitated but silent around and during the surge of LH secretion experimentally induced by estrogen treatment in ovariectomized rats as mentioned above (13). However, the pulse generator was steadily working even during the LH surge; i.e., MUA volleys became clearer and more frequent when naloxone was infused into proestrous rats in which the preovulatory surge of LH secretion was blocked by pentobarbital sodium (13).
Although not from the electrophysiological study, there is also evidence supporting that the pulse generator is not involved in the LH surge. We found that naloxone infusion in the morning of proestrus, which was reported by Kalra et al. (11) to have induced a premature LH surge, certainly induced an increase in pulsatile LH secretion but did not affect the timing, magnitude, and duration of the preovulatory LH surge that should have occurred in the afternoon (see Ref. 4). This finding suggested that naloxone stimulated the GnRH pulse generator but did not stimulate the neuronal mechanism responsible for the preovulatory LH surge, a GnRH surge generator.
All these features of the GnRH pulse generator are consonant with the idea of the existence of a GnRH surge generator, distinct from the GnRH pulse generator. Among these, however, the feature of barbiturate resistance provided the most important clue supporting the idea that this neuronal mechanism could never be a GnRH surge generator, because, since 1950, it has been known that the preovulatory surge of LH secretion in rats is blocked by a barbiturate, pentobarbital sodium (see Refs. 4, 13).
| Search for the GnRH surge generator in rats |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptor complex (see Ref. 13), the feature of the possible GnRH surge generator, barbiturate sensitivity, suggested to us that this neuronal mechanism involves GABA as an important inhibitory neurotransmitter. The role of GABA was then tested by examining the effect of the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline administered in the morning, prior to the surge of LH secretion, in proestrous rats (see Ref. 5). The result was clear-cut: no significant changes in LH secretion occurred during the bicuculline infusion, unlike during naloxone infusion, but afterward a rapid and noticeable rise in LH secretion occurred, clearly suggesting the occurrence of a premature LH surge. In addition, this premature LH surge by bicuculline was not due to a phase shift in the biological clock (14). It is possible that the disinhibition of GnRH neurons from GABA results in the LH surge. In agreement with the hypothesis that inhibitory GABA neurons are involved in the neuronal mechanism of the preovulatory surge of LH secretion, GABA release in the POA decreased with the LH surge, whereas its release in the MBH showed no significant correlations with the LH surge in ovariectomized rats treated with estrogen (10). There are also findings suggesting that the inhibitory action of GABA neurons reaches GnRH neurons directly (see Ref. 10).
We then tried to prove that such a bicuculline-induced LH surge was produced by GnRH neurons that are involved in the spontaneous preovulatory LH surge. Because it is known that GnRH neurons in the POA express Fos protein in association with the LH surge in proestrous or ovariectomized rats treated with estrogen (5), we used dual immunoperoxidase/immunofluorescence staining to test whether bicuculline was effective in inducing Fos protein in the same GnRH neurons that express the protein during the spontaneous preovulatory LH surge (5). We found that the distribution and proportion of GnRH neurons expressing Fos in response to bicuculline were identical to those during the spontaneous LH surge; i.e., ~50% of GnRH neurons in the POA expressed Fos prematurely at 1400 after bicuculline stimulation (Fig. 2B
), just as seen at 1700 during the spontaneous LH surge. This confirmed that bicuculline advanced the timing of the activation of GnRH neurons in the POA that were responsible for the preovulatory LH surge.
|
| Two subgroups of GnRH neurons are present in rat forebrains |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here we propose the hypothesis that two distinct subgroups of GnRH neurons are involved in the control of gonadotropin secretion, at least in rats; one subgroup constitutes the GnRH pulse generator associated with opioid neurons, and the other the GnRH surge generator associated with GABA neurons (Fig. 3
). The GnRH neurons involved in the pulse generator are mainly located in the MBH, whereas those involved in the surge generator are located in the POA. These two groups of GnRH neurons may receive the feedback effects of estrogen mediated by opioid and GABA neurons, respectively. Estrogen exerts an inhibitory action on a group of GnRH neurons via the action on opioid neurons and as a result produces a negative feedback effect on LH secretion throughout the entire estrous cycle. Estrogen also inhibits another group of GnRH neurons via the action on GABA neurons, but this inhibition is disrupted at 1400 on the day of proestrus, probably by the input from the biological clock to cause the surge of LH secretion, and as a result produces what is called a positive feedback effect on LH secretion. For this reason, the classical, rather complicated concept that the estrogen-responsive neurons themselves change phasically in response to estrogen (i.e., are at first inhibited and subsequently facilitated) could be improved.
|
|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Lanfranco, L. Bonelli, M. Baldi, E. Me, F. Broglio, and E. Ghigo Acylated Ghrelin Inhibits Spontaneous Luteinizing Hormone Pulsatility and Responsiveness to Naloxone But Not That to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Young Men: Evidence for a Central Inhibitory Action of Ghrelin on the Gonadal Axis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 3633 - 3639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Kinsey-Jones, X. F. Li, S. M. Luckman, and K. T. O'Byrne Effects of Kisspeptin-10 on the Electrophysiological Manifestation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator Activity in the Female Rat Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1004 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Constantin and S. Wray Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-1 Neuronal Activity Is Independent of Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 279 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Funabashi, A. Sano, D. Mitsushima, and F. Kimura Nicotine Inhibits Pulsatile Luteinizing Hormone Secretion in Human Males But Not in Human Females, and Tolerance to This Nicotine Effect Is Lost within One Week of Quitting Smoking J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 3908 - 3913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, T. Tanaka, and H. Kamomae Different Effects of Subnormal Levels of Progesterone on the Pulsatile and Surge Mode Secretion of Luteinizing Hormone in Ovariectomized Goats Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 141 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Bosch, M. J. Kelly, and O. K. Ronnekleiv Distribution, Neuronal Colocalization, and 17{beta}-E2 Modulation of Small Conductance Calcium-Activated K+ Channel (SK3) mRNA in the Guinea Pig Brain Endocrinology, March 1, 2002; 143(3): 1097 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Pak, G. R. Lynch, and P.-S. Tsai Testosterone and Estrogen Act via Different Pathways to Inhibit Puberty in the Male Siberian Hamster (Phodopus sungorus) Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3309 - 3316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Suter, W. J. Song, T. L. Sampson, J.-P. Wuarin, J. T. Saunders, F. E. Dudek, and S. M. Moenter Genetic Targeting of Green Fluorescent Protein to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neurons: Characterization of Whole-Cell Electrophysiological Properties and Morphology Endocrinology, January 1, 2000; 141(1): 412 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |