Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


News Physiol Sci 13: 251-255, 1998;
1548-9213/98 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giovannardi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peres, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giovannardi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peres, A.
News in Physiological Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 5, 251-255, October 1998
© 1998 Int. Union Physiol. Sci./Am. Physiol. Soc.

Flash Photolysis of Caged Compounds: Casting Light on Physiological Processes

Stefano Giovannardi, Luca Landò and Antonio Peres

S. Giovannardi, L. Landò, and A. Peres are in the Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale e Funzionale, Università dell'Insubria, Via Dunant 3,21100 Varese, Italy.

    Abstract
 
Photorelease of bioactive molecules from inactive precursors is a very powerful tool for the study of the molecular mechanisms underlying physiological processes as diverse as ionic channel modulation, exocytosis, phototransduction, ligand-receptor interaction, and cross-bridge activity. A brief account of the methodology, available compounds, and fields of application is presented here.


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Variety of caged compounds
 Applications in physiology
 Apparatus
 Conclusions
 References
 
A caged compound is a biologically relevant molecule rendered inactive by a link to a chemical group (the "cage") through a photolabile bond. Typically, the active molecule can be released by breaking the bond with a pulse of intense light in the near ultraviolet (UV; 350–360 nm) range. Special systems generating very brief and intense flashes are often used for this purpose, and thus the technique is also called "flash photolysis."

The characteristics of this approach are advantageous because a particular intra- or extracellular region of the preparation can be preloaded with an exactly determined amount of substance in the inactive form; subsequently, it can be activated at a very precise time. In this way, delays due to diffusion of substances into the preparation and spatial and temporal inhomogeneities may be minimized. Therefore, kinetics studies of ligand-receptor interaction can be performed as well as characterization of Ca2+-dependent currents or determination of Ca2+ cooperativity in neurosecretion.

A number of other secondary, but often very useful, advantages may be offered by the use of caging molecules: in certain cases, for instance, the caging group protects the agonist against metabolic transformation before it reaches its target [inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3)]; in others, the cage renders the substance membrane permeable (adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate, luciferin). Finally, problems related to desensitization of the receptors are also avoided.


    Variety of caged compounds
 Top
 Introduction
 Variety of caged compounds
 Applications in physiology
 Apparatus
 Conclusions
 References
 
Initially, photorelease of caged compounds concerned primarily molecules normally produced or released in cells and tissues, such as ATP or neurotransmitters. Now, the number of endogenous compounds has been significantly increased: the neurotransmitter list includes glycine, {gamma}-aminobutyric acid, glutamic and aspartic acids, serotonin, dopamine, epinephrine, and many others; second messengers include cyclic nucleotides, cyclic ADP-ribose, as well as arachidonic acid and photoactivatable nitric oxide donors; in addition to Ca2+, the concentration of H+ can be made to increase on photolysis. The variety of the commercially available compounds has also been greatly widened to include exogenous substances such as chelators, ionophores (both for divalent and monovalent cations), enzyme inhibitors or activators (serine-protease inhibitor, protein kinase C activator), fluorescent dyes, and others. Finally, a researcher can also create his own particular caged molecule using commercially available caging kits (6).


    Applications in physiology
 Top
 Introduction
 Variety of caged compounds
 Applications in physiology
 Apparatus
 Conclusions
 References
 
Manipulation of intracellular Ca2+.
Control of the cytosolic Ca2+ level is of primary importance for the study of a wide variety of cellular events, from ion channel regulation to secretory vesicle fusion, muscle fiber contraction, and regulation of biochemical pathways. Researchers familiar with electrophysiological techniques used to keep low levels of intracellular Ca2+ concentration by introducing rather high quantities of Ca2+ chelating agents, such as ethylene glycol-bis(ß-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) or 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA), in their whole cell pipettes. We may define this sort of method as a "passive approach" because the desired free Ca2+ level, in this case, would stay constant in the presence of any sort of perturbation. In cells in which voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are present on the membrane, their controlled opening, caused by voltage-clamp steps, may be conveniently used to produce entry of Ca2+ from the outside.

Use of caged compounds, active on the cellular Ca2+ homeostasis, represents a much more versatile possibility of actively controlling the cytosolic Ca2+ level.

Three categories of caged compounds have been used to control intracellular Ca2+ in single cells: 1) photosensitive Ca2+ chelators, such as DM-Nitrophen, nitrophenyl-EGTA (NP-EGTA), and diazo 2 (1, 5, 13); 2) calcium ionophores, derived from the well-known A-23187; and 3) second messengers, such as caged IP3 and caged cyclic ADP-ribose.

DM-Nitrophen and NP-EGTA have structures deriving from EDTA and from EGTA, respectively (Fig. 1Go), with the addition of groups that influence the affinity of the molecule for Ca2+. When the photolabile bond is broken, the structural change causes a decrease in the affinity of the chelator for Ca2+ with consequent release of the ion. In the case of DM-Nitrophen, the dissociation constant for Ca2+ increases from 5.0 x 10–9 to 3.0 x 10–3 M, whereas, for NP-EGTA, the increase is from 80 x 10–9 to 1 x 10–3 M. Diazo 2 works in the opposite way: its affinity for Ca2+, in fact, is relatively low (2.2 x 10–6 M) before photolysis, and it increases by a factor of 30 after photolysis. This last compound may then be used to rapidly dampen high Ca2+ levels produced by other stimulants.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. A: nitrophenyl (NP)-EGTA complexed with Ca2+. On illumination, this complex is cleaved to yield free Ca2+ and 2 iminodiacetic acid photoproducts. Affinity of the photoproducts for Ca2+ is ~12,500-fold lower than that of NP-EGTA. B: 1-(4,5-dimethoxy-2-nitrophenyl) (DMNP-EDTA) complexed with Ca2+. On illumination, this complex is cleaved to yield free Ca2+ and 2 iminodiacetic acid photoproducts. Affinity of the photoproducts for Ca2+ is ~600,000-fold lower than that of DMNP-EDTA. [Reprinted from Ref. 6 with permission.]

 
The efficacy of these kinds of substances can be monitored by measuring the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration. This cannot be done using fura 2 together with the caged compounds because fura 2 requires excitation wavelengths that would cause significant photolysis of the caged substance (typically 340 and 380 nm). It is therefore necessary to make use of different Ca2+ indicators whose excitation wavelength(s) is in the visible range. One of the most used indicators for this purpose has been fluo 3 (9). This substance has a maximum absorption at 490 nm and increases its 520-nm emission as a function of free Ca2+; however, fluo 3 does not exhibit a spectral shift like fura 2, and this prevents ratiometric determinations. Figure 2Go shows an example of Ca2+ changes induced by graded stimulation with caged IP3.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Ca2+ responses induced by variable amounts of photoreleased inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3; IP3-releasing flashes appear as interruptions in the fluorescent trace and are indicated by arrowheads). A: a barely detectable Ca2+ increase is caused by a 50-ms flash. B: doubling the flash duration makes the Ca2+ level slowly increase toward the generation of a Ca2+ spike. C and D: successive doubling of the flash duration elicits Ca2+ transients having a larger peak and a shorter lag. In D, a slowly declining plateau also appears, which is terminated by a fast descent to the basal level. [Reprinted from Ref. 11, with kind permission of Elsevier Science-NL, Sara Burgerhartstraat 25, 1055 KV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.]

 
Recently, however, new long-wavelength Ca2+ indicators have been synthesized, such as fura red and calcium green (6), which allow use of a ratio procedure for the quantization of Ca2+ levels. These characteristics make them suitable for use in flash photolysis experiments.

Ligand-receptor interactions.
Fast kinetic studies of ligand-receptor interaction are made possible by the instantaneous photolysis of the ligand. Often the evaluation of the rate constants of these reactions has been hampered by diffusion problems. These problems can be overcome by letting the inactive caged ligand diffuse as long as necessary to reach a uniform concentration in the proximity of the receptor; then the response induced by the instantaneous photolytic flash will more reliably reflect the kinetics of the transduction process. Rate constants in the order of 10–6 s have been evaluated in this way (10).

These advantages apply also to intracellular receptors, such as the ryanodine receptors, that can be activated by releasing Ca2+ from photosensitive chelators (7).

Regulation of ionic channels.
Modulation of membrane ionic channels by cytosolic second messengers is another field for which photolysis is particularly well suited. The use of photosensitive Ca2+ chelators finds application for the study of the numerous Ca2+-activated channels (8); IP3 and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels may also be investigated in this way. Figure 3Go shows an example of K+ channel activation after photorelease of Ca2+ from a caged chelator.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Ca2+-activated K+ currents recorded from an Aplysia neuron filled with 5 mM nitr 5 and 3.75 mM Ca2+. Bottom traces show the photodiode monitor of light intensities for 4 flashes. Increasing flashes were calculated to raise surface Ca2+ concentration by 0.11, 0.66, 1.52, and 2.54 µM. Cell was voltage clamped to the reversal potential for nonspecific Ca2+-activated cation current (–22 mV) before each flash. Medium was normal artificial seawater containing 50 µM tetrodotoxin. [Reproduced from Ref. 8 by copyright permission of The Rockefeller University Press.]

 
Photolysis can also be used to transform a normally active molecule into an inactive one. An example is given by the Ca2+ channel blocker nifedipine: in this case, the photolytic flash may relieve the inhibition of the Ca2+ channels, offering a new way of investigating the gating process (4).

Secretion.
Ca2+ triggers exocytosis of secretory vesicles in both nerve endings and endocrine cells; manipulation of the Ca2+ concentration by photolysis of Ca2+ chelators allows the study of the secretory mechanisms with very high time resolution, especially if coupled with membrane capacitance measurements (12).

Muscle contraction.
Muscle contraction and relaxation were among the first physiological processes studied by flash photolysis (3). For these kinds of studies, caged ATP is often used (15). Repeated flashes can be delivered to the same preparation, and the amount of released ATP can be calibrated against the energy of flash, allowing dose-response experiments. In this way, the shortening induced by hydrolysis of a single ATP molecule can be estimated (15). The steps of the relaxation process have also been investigated by either photolysis of caged ATP or photoactivation of the Ca2+ chelator diazo 2.


    Apparatus
 Top
 Introduction
 Variety of caged compounds
 Applications in physiology
 Apparatus
 Conclusions
 References
 
The active molecule can be uncaged essentially in three ways: 1) by the UV illumination of a normal fluorescence microscope, 2) by a flashlamp, and 3) by a UV laser. The three systems greatly differ in terms of cost and release efficiency.

If the expected time course of the biological process under study is slow (on the order of seconds or more), then a normal, shutter-controlled arc lamp is the simplest choice. If it is necessary to monitor Ca2+ changes induced by photolysis, then a filter changer can be easily added. A band-pass filter at 490 nm for fluo 3 excitation is kept most of the time on the light path: this can be changed, when desired, with a broadband UV filter centered at 350 nm, to induce photolysis. This arrangement has the advantage of using the same optics for both the photolyzing light and the fluo 3 excitation light. The photolyzing light reaches the cell through the microscope objective, making certain that the spot is centered and well focused.

The main disadvantage of this arrangement is the weakness of the light intensity reaching the cell, due to absorptions in the excitation light path. With this system, it is often necessary to apply photolyzing light pulses having rather long durations (up to seconds), and this poses limits on the kinds of events that can be studied.

To induce faster and greater release of the active compound, it is necessary to use either a flashlamp or a laser. The first is typically an arc lamp over which the electrical charge stored in a bank of capacitors is applied in a short (<1 ms) time. In this way, very high photolyzing powers can be reached. However, to make use of the full power of the flash lamp, no optical fibers should be used and, consequently, the flashlamp itself should be placed very close (few cm) to the cell. This placement is rather inconvenient because the housing of the lamp is normally rather heavy and cumbersome. In addition, the very high current discharged on the lamp may cause relevant electromagnetic artifacts on the electrophysiological apparatus placed nearby. Another disadvantage is the low repetition rate, due to the time necessary to recharge the capacitors.

A UV laser is the best choice because it can generate a powerful and collimated light emission. The output beam can be brought to the excitation path of an epifluorescence microscope, allowing further focusing on the biological preparation. Coupling of such a system with a confocal microscope permits uncaging of the desired compound in a very small volume ("focal uncaging," Ref. 14).

The main drawback of the UV laser is its cost; recently, however, a low-cost UV laser suitable for flash photolysis of caged compounds has been announced (2), which should render this technique affordable to many laboratories.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Introduction
 Variety of caged compounds
 Applications in physiology
 Apparatus
 Conclusions
 References
 
Photolysis of caged compounds may be combined with other optical and electrophysiological techniques to study a wide variety of physiological processes at the cellular level. In particular, whole cell patch-clamp and confocal microfluorometry represent techniques that can be profitably used to monitor cellular responses to photoactivation of the caged molecule.

The perspective of the availability of low-cost, high-efficiency light sources, together with the continuously increasing number of commercial compounds and the possibility of creating a personally tailored caged substance, would allow a large number of laboratories to utilize this technique.

With the help of this powerful technique, much progress will be gained in understanding the elementary events at the base of many physiological processes.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Variety of caged compounds
 Applications in physiology
 Apparatus
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Adams, S. R., J. P. Y. Kao, and R. Y. Tsien. Biologically useful chelators that take up Ca2+ upon illumination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111: 7957–7968, 1989.
  2. Engert, F., G. G. Paulus, and T. Bonhoeffer. A low-cost UV laser for flash photolysis of caged compounds. J. Neurosci. Methods 66: 47–54, 1996.[Medline]
  3. Faddis, M. N., and J. E. Brown. Flash photolysis of caged compounds in Limulus ventral photoreceptors. J. Gen. Physiol. 100: 547–570, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Feldmeyer, D., P. Zöllner, B. Pohl, and W. Melzer. Calcium current reactivation after flash photolysis of nifedipine in skeletal muscle fibres of the frog. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 487: 51–56, 1995.[Medline]
  5. Gurney, A. M., and H. A. Lester. Light-flash physiology with synthetic photosensitive compounds. Physiol. Rev. 67: 583–617, 1987.[Free Full Text]
  6. Haugland, R. P. Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Molecular Probes, 1996.
  7. Lamb, G. D., and D. G. Stephenson. Activation of ryanodine receptors by flash photolysis of caged Ca2+. Biophys. J. 68: 946–948, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Landò, L., and R. S. Zucker. "Caged calcium" in Aplysia pacemaker neurons. Characterization of calcium-activated potassium and nonspecific cation currents. J. Gen. Physiol. 93: 1017–1060, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Minta, A., J. P. Y. Kao, and R. Y. Tsien. Fluorescent indicators for cytosolic calcium based on rhodamine and fluorescein chromatophores. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 8171–8178, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Niu, L., R. Wieboldt, D. Ramesh, B. K. Carpenter, and G. P. Hess. Synthesis and characterization of a caged receptor ligand suitable for chemical kinetic investigations of the glycine receptor in the 3-ms time domain. Biochemistry 35: 8136–8142, 1996.[Medline]
  11. Peres, A. InsP3- and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release in single mouse oocytes. FEBS Lett. 275: 213–216, 1990.[Medline]
  12. Thomas, P., J. G. Wong, and W. Almers. Millisecond studies of secretion in single rat pituitary cells stimulated by flash photolysis of caged Ca2+. EMBO J. 12: 303–306, 1993.[Medline]
  13. Tsien, R. Y. Fluorescence measurement and photochemical manipulation of cytosolic free calcium. Trends Neurosci. 11: 419–424, 1988.[Medline]
  14. Wang, S. S.-H., and G. J. Augustine. Confocal imaging and local photolysis of caged compounds: dual probes of synaptic function. Neuron 15: 755–760, 1995.[Medline]
  15. Yamada, T., O. Abe, T. Kobayashi, and H. Sugi. Myofilament sliding per ATP molecule in rabbit muscle fibres studied using laser flash photolysis of caged ATP. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 466: 229–243, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giovannardi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peres, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giovannardi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Peres, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online