|
|
||||||||
D. C. Jackson is in the Department of Molecular Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biotechnology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912.
| Abstract |
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A key adaptation underlying the anaerobic performance of Chrysemys is a profound metabolic depression to ~10% of its aerobic rate at the same temperature. Because the turtle is ectothermic ("cold-blooded"), even its aerobic metabolic rate is only a small fraction of that of a similar-sized euthermic mammal or bird. But when it is deprived of oxygen at winter temperatures, the combined depressant effects of low temperature and anoxia further reduce the turtle's estimated ATP production to a rate <0.01% of a similar-sized aerobic rat at rest in a thermally neutral environment. Under these conditions, the turtle's heart rate can be as low as 1 beat every 510 min.
Remarkably, despite the profound metabolic reduction, cellular ATP levels and energy state remain virtually unchanged in the anoxic turtle, revealing a coordinated, and as yet poorly understood, downregulation in both anaerobic ATP production (13) and cellular ATP utilization (6). The anoxic turtles are somehow able to sacrifice a large fraction of the energy-requiring activities of the cells and still retain function. Protein breakdown and synthesis are severely curtailed, and ion channels are downregulated, leading to a reduction in the ATP required for powering ion pumps (1, 2, 12).
The turtle's low anaerobic metabolism has clear significance for extending the period of anoxia. Low metabolism diminishes the rates at which both stored substrates such as glycogen are consumed and acid endproducts such as lactic acid are produced. Either of these processes, the depletion of glycogen or the developing lactic acidosis, could define the limits to anoxic survival in this animal, and the turtles have made provisions to lessen these risks in both cases.
With regard to glycogen, the painted turtle possesses a large liver (4% of body mass) with high glycogen content (810%) plus additional stores of glycogen in skeletal muscle and heart. These reserves could support anaerobic utilization at the observed glycolytic rate for ~5.5 months, close to the maximum apneic submergence it would ever face naturally. Glycogen depletion, therefore, would not ordinarily represent a problem unless a turtle begins a hard winter with low reserves.
The production and accumulation of lactic acid, however, is clearly a serious threat, and its management by the anoxic turtle is a major challenge that it faces. Lactic acid is a relatively strong acid (pK ~4), so its buildup in the body can result in a metabolic acidosis of enormous proportions. Even though the rate at which lactic acid is produced is slow due to metabolic depression, the time scale over which it accumulates may be great. As a result, plasma concentrations as high as 200 mM have been observed after experimental anoxic periods approaching five months in duration (14).
How can a turtle experience lactate levels of this magnitude and still maintain a viable body fluid pH? The answer is that the turtle uses internal buffering mechanisms similar in principle to those that are well known from other organisms but in an extreme form not found in other vertebrates. In addition, it utilizes a previously unknown mechanism whereby it sequesters lactic acid in its shell and bone during the anoxic episode. During anoxic submergence, the turtle is in most respects a closed system, exchanging little with its environment. Some extrapulmonary gas exchange occurs, and the turtles take up water from the surroundings, but no pulmonary ventilation or feeding occurs, and we have found no evidence for urinary excretion. To counteract metabolic acidosis, therefore, the turtle must rely principally on endogenous buffering mechanisms.
| Body fluid buffering |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the volumes of the peritoneal and pericardial fluids are large compared with other vertebrates (~16 ml/kg and 2 ml/kg, respectively) and bicarbonate levels are high, their contributions to overall buffering of a large acid load, relative to the entire extracellular compartment, are nonetheless rather minor. Could there be some other advantage these turtles enjoy by having their viscera and heart bathed in highly alkaline solutions? This question is unresolved.
Lactate distributes preferentially to the extracellular fluid in anoxic turtles; lactate concentrations of liver and skeletal muscle, expressed as mmol/kg cell water, are only ~60% of extracellular values (10). Both intracellular and extracellular fluids share in the buffering process, however, and the fall in pH observed is similar in both compartments. Yet it is obvious that when lactate levels rise to the very high values reported (100200 mM), the intrinsic capacity of both compartments should be overwhelmed. The observation, though, is that both blood pH and intracellular pH remain at viable values. At 3°C, for example, blood pH falls from its control value of ~8.0 to ~7.0 after three months of anoxic submergence. Over the same period, however, plasma lactate concentration has risen by ~150 mM, far in excess of the concentration of extracellular buffers. Plasma bicarbonate concentration has fallen to <5 mM, and the pericardial and peritoneal fluids are similarly depleted of their bicarbonate. Clearly, the normal extracellular capacity has been supplemented by recruitment of buffers from elsewhere in the body. The predominant source of these additional buffers is the turtle's characteristic structural feature: its shell.
| The turtle's shell and its contribution to extracellular buffering |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
A simple model of this buffer release mechanism illustrates the points already made and also introduces other aspects of this overall process (Fig. 3A
). The triggering event is the production and release into the extracellular fluid of lactic acid. The first line of defense is the preexisting extracellular bicarbonate, but the developing acidemia causes the mobilization of calcium and magnesium carbonates from shell and bone. The carbonate supplements the extracellular fluid buffering, and the divalent ions balance the lactate charge. At low temperature, the carbon dioxide generated by the titration of carbonate diffuses out of the animal into the surrounding water, with the result that blood PCO2 remains unchanged or even falls somewhat from the value observed during air breathing. A significant portion of the mobilized calcium (as much as two-thirds of the total at high lactate levels) complexes reversibly with lactate to form Ca-Lactate+ (9). A similar reaction presumably also occurs between magnesium and lactate. These reactions, which are of negligible importance under most physiological states because of the low concentrations of the reactants, are of great importance in this situation and substantially minimize the increase in the ionized forms of calcium and magnesium. Nonetheless, rather large increases in free calcium, up to 12.5 meq, do occur, the consequences of which have not been fully explored. Other plasma ion concentrations also change significantly during the course of anoxia: potassium concentration rises from 2.5 meq to as high as 10 meq, and chloride concentration falls from ~80 meq to as low as 4050 meq. These changes, like the changes in calcium and magnesium, can be viewed as compensatory to the metabolic acidosis by balancing the increased lactate and minimizing the change in the strong ion difference (9). The potassium presumably derives from the intracellular compartment, whereas the fall in chloride concentration may be due largely to dilution by water uptake from the surroundings, manifested by an increase in body weight during submergence (14). Plasma sodium concentration does not change significantly during long-term anoxia, but we have recently found that bone and shell release a sizable amount of sodium, so that this release may serve to stabilize sodium concentration in the face of the body fluid dilution. Despite the uptake of water, plasma osmolality increases after three months of anoxia at 3°C by ~100 mosmol/kgH2O (from 250 to 350 mosmol/kgH2O), primarily due to the increases in lactate and calcium (9).
|
Mechanism 2: lactic acid uptake and release by shell and bone.
The storage of lactate in bone has apparently not previously been described as a significant contributor to the management of a lactate load. We discovered it serendipitously when we tested 14C activity of shell powder generated during dissection of anoxic turtles treated with 14C-labeled lactate (11). The high values prompted a systematic investigation that revealed a significant and progressive uptake of lactate into turtle shell during anoxia (7). In a study at 10°C, for example, shell lactate (meq/kg wet weight) rose in parallel with plasma lactate (meq/l) during anoxia and then declined in parallel during recovery (Fig. 4
). Similar observations were made during anoxic submergence at both 3 and 20°C. The total lactate that accumulated in shell and bone, which was a function both of the concentrations reached and the unusually large mass of these structures, amounted to almost 50% of the total body lactate after nine days anoxia at 10°C or three months anoxia at 3°C.
|
A model for the lactate uptake mechanism is shown in Fig. 3B
. According to this scheme, lactate generated from anaerobic glycolysis moves into the shell and bone accompanied by hydrogen (note that exchange of two lactates for one carbonate is an alternative and equivalent mechanism to the one illustrated). The lactate is sequestered in the shell, possibly combined with calcium, and the hydrogen is buffered by carbonate. The molecular carbon dioxide produced by the acid titration moves into the extracellular fluid and then out of the animal into the surrounding water via extrapulmonary routes. The unique feature of this mechanism as depicted is that it segregates a large fraction of accumulated lactate, buffers the associated protons, and, because the carbon dioxide is lost, has no effect whatsoever on the acid-base balance of the extracellular fluid. This large component of the lactic acid burden of the body is essentially invisible to the general body fluids. When the anoxic period is over, lactic acid is released from the shell and reutilized (11).
Might this lactate sequestration mechanism be important in other organisms experiencing increases in circulating lactate? Perhaps, but it is unlikely to be as significant as in the anoxic turtle for three reasons. First, as just noted, the shell and bone of the turtle are an unusually large fraction of body mass, so the capacity for uptake greatly exceeds that of other animals. Second, the time scale over which lactic acidosis can occur in submerged turtles can be extremely prolonged (up to months), thereby permitting substantial uptake despite the inherently slow kinetics of bone exchange. Finally, the levels of lactate reached in the anoxic turtle are extraordinarily high compared with other circumstances. Lactate production during intense exercise, in contrast, is an acute phenomenon lasting just seconds or minutes and resulting in circulating lactate levels that are at most 2030 mM. Furthermore, the clearance of blood lactate during recovery may occur too rapidly for significant bone participation. Nevertheless, there is no reason to think that bone from other organisms could not store lactate under appropriate conditions.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The extreme anoxic acidoses described in this article were produced under experimental conditions in the laboratory, and it is uncertain whether turtles ever experience conditions this severe in nature. If aquatic PO2 is adequate, these hard-shelled turtles can extract enough dissolved oxygen from the water to significantly reduce their reliance on anaerobic metabolism; however, oxygen can become depleted in natural aquatic environments, and turtles have been reported to bury themselves in anoxic mud at the bottoms of ponds. Should anoxic conditions prevail, and even if they should persist for several months, Chrysemys and its near relatives are well equipped with the necessary adaptations to survive the winter and to fully recover when warm weather returns.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Warren and D. C. Jackson Effects of temperature on anoxic submergence: skeletal buffering, lactate distribution, and glycogen utilization in the turtle, Trachemys scripta Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R458 - R467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Warren and D. C. Jackson The role of mineralized tissue in the buffering of lactic acid during anoxia and exercise in the leopard frog Rana pipiens J. Exp. Biol., March 15, 2005; 208(6): 1117 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Warren and D. C. Jackson Effects of swimming on metabolic recovery from anoxia in the painted turtle J. Exp. Biol., July 1, 2004; 207(15): 2705 - 2713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |