Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


News Physiol Sci 15: 281-284, 2000;
1548-9213/00 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburg, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburg, G. M.
News in Physiological Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 6, 281-284, December 2000
© 2000 Int. Union Physiol. Sci./Am. Physiol. Soc.

Calmodulin and Excitation-Contraction Coupling

Susan L. Hamilton, Irina Serysheva and Gale M. Strasburg

S. Hamilton is a Professor and I. Serysheva is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics at Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. G. M. Strasburg is a Professor in the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1224.

    Abstract
 
Excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac and skeletal muscle involves the transverse-tubule voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel and the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release channel. Both of these ion channels bind and are modulated by calmodulin in both its Ca2+-bound and Ca2+-free forms. Calmodulin is, therefore, potentially an important regulator of excitation-contraction coupling. Its precise role, however, has not yet been defined.


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 CaM as an intracellular...
 CaM and the voltage-dependent...
 CaM and RYR1
 A role for CaM...
 References
 
Excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling is the process by which depolarization of the muscle fiber membrane, elicited by a nerve action potential, triggers the release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) (1). The resulting rise in intracellular Ca2+ concentration activates the troponin complex, thereby initiating the contraction of the muscle. The two primary proteins involved in the initial events of E-C coupling are the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and the ryanodine receptor (RYR), which are both Ca2+ channels (Fig. 1Go). Skeletal and cardiac muscle have different isoforms of both the DHPR and RYR. The skeletal muscle DHPR, which is an L-type Ca2+ channel, is composed of four subunits: {alpha}1S (190–212 kDa), {alpha}2–{delta} (125 kDa), ß (52–58 kDa), and {gamma} (25 kDa). The cardiac DHPR has three known subunits: {alpha}1C (240 kDa), {alpha}2–{delta} (125 kDa), and ß (62 kDa). The {gamma}-subunit has not yet been identified as a subunit of the cardiac channel. The {alpha}1-subunit of the DHPR forms the channel pore and contains the binding sites for channel-specific drugs.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Proteins involved in excitation-contraction coupling. Both the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RYR1) bind and are modulated by calmodulin (CaM). SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum; t-tubule, transverse-tubule. Greek letters represent DHPR subunits.

 
In mammalian skeletal muscle, the DHPR functions as both a voltage sensor and a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel, but influx of Ca2+ via the DHPR is not required for E-C coupling. The two skeletal muscle proteins are thought to be physically coupled, such that depolarization-induced changes in the conformation of the DHPR are directly sensed by the RYR, triggering its opening. In cardiac muscle the mechanism of E-C coupling appears to involve Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR). The cardiac DHPR serves as a functional voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel allowing entry of extracellular Ca2+, which raises the local intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Binding of Ca2+ to the cytoplasmic domain of the cardiac muscle RYR (RYR2) then induces the channel to open, releasing Ca2+ from the SR. Although the primary signal in skeletal muscle appears to be the mechanical signal, CICR may serve to propagate the Ca2+ signal by activating skeletal muscle RYRs (RYR1s) that are not coupled to DHPRs.

Release of Ca2+ from the SR is controlled by the Ca2+ release channel or RYR. The RYR1 and RYR2 are both homotetramers with a subunit molecular mass of ~565 kDa, and they share 66% sequence identity and ~80% overall homology. Approximately 4/5 of the RYRs are predicted to be cytoplasmic, with only 1/5 of the molecule at the carboxy terminus forming the luminal and membrane-spanning domains.

In addition to the primary mechanisms of regulation of E-C coupling (mechanical gating or CICR), Ca2+ release is likely to be modulated by other proteins bound to the DHPR or to RYR. One of these proteins, calmodulin (CaM), regulates the activity of the DHPR (8, 15), RYR1 (11), and RYR2 (13). On the basis of its interactions with these channels, CaM is likely to play an important role in both cardiac and skeletal muscle E-C coupling.


    CaM as an intracellular Ca2+ sensor
 Top
 Introduction
 CaM as an intracellular...
 CaM and the voltage-dependent...
 CaM and RYR1
 A role for CaM...
 References
 
CaM is a ubiquitously expressed Ca2+ binding protein composed of an amino terminal and a carboxy terminal lobe connected by an eight-turn {alpha}-helix. The structures of CaM in its Ca2+-free (apoCaM) (5) and Ca2+-bound (Ca2+CaM) forms (obtained from the Brookhaven Protein Databank website: http://cmm.info.nih.gov/modeling/pdb_at_a_glance.html) are shown in Fig. 2Go. CaM binds most target proteins in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Both the amino terminal and carboxy terminal lobes have two E-F hand Ca2+ binding sites that undergo Ca2+-dependent conformational changes that expose hydrophobic binding pockets, allowing binding to amphipathic {alpha}-helical domains within the target proteins (9). Ca2+CaM undergoes another major change in conformation on binding to its target. The structure of CaM bound to an amphipathic {alpha}-helix from myosin light chain kinase is shown in Fig. 3BGo (4).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. The structure of free CaM (apoCaM) [A, shown by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)] and bound CaM (Ca2+CaM) (B, shown by X-ray diffraction). N, amino terminal; C, carboxy terminal.

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. The structure of CaM-peptide complexes. A: apoCaM (blue) bound to an IQ domain on myosin (red) (theoretical model). B: Ca2+CaM (blue) complexed with its binding domain from rabbit skeletal myosin light chain kinase (red) (NMR images).

 
In addition to the Ca2+-dependent binding of CaM to target proteins, CaM binds to some proteins in the absence of Ca2+ (9). Several types of Ca2+-independent binding sites for CaM have been reported (9). One type of Ca2+-independent CaM binding site is an IQ motif (IQXXXRGXXXR). Some IQ motifs, however, can also bind Ca2+CaM. In binding to an IQ motif, apoCaM also undergoes a major conformational change. The structure of apoCaM bound to an IQ motif from myosin is shown in Fig. 3AGo (3).


    CaM and the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel
 Top
 Introduction
 CaM as an intracellular...
 CaM and the voltage-dependent...
 CaM and RYR1
 A role for CaM...
 References
 
CaM is both a positive and negative regulator of the cardiac L-type Ca2+ channel. Elevations in intracellular Ca2+ concentration produce a conformational change in CaM, tethered to the channel, producing L-channel inactivation (8). Zuhlke et al. (15) have shown that CaM serves as a Ca2+ sensor for both positive and negative regulation of the cardiac L-type Ca2+ channel (8). A mutant CaM that cannot bind Ca2+ at any of the four Ca2+ binding sites blocks the effects of Ca2+CaM on the L-type Ca2+ channel, suggesting that both the Ca2+-free and Ca2+-bound forms of CaM can bind to this channel. This ability of Ca2+CaM to inhibit the channel appears to be mediated via its binding to an IQ motif in the cytoplasmic carboxy tail of the {alpha}1-subunit. If the isoleucine of this motif is mutated to an alanine, the Ca2+-dependent inactivation is lost, and this unmasks a strong facilitation by CaM. If the isoleucine is converted, however, to a glutamate, both of the effects of CaM (inactivation and facilitation) are lost (15). These findings suggest that either apoCaM and Ca2+CaM are binding in the same region of the DHPR (probably with different determinants for binding) or that Ca2+CaM binding sites are allosterically regulated by the binding of apoCaM.


    CaM and RYR1
 Top
 Introduction
 CaM as an intracellular...
 CaM and the voltage-dependent...
 CaM and RYR1
 A role for CaM...
 References
 
Dual regulation by CaM is also seen with RYR1. RYR1 is the major CaM binding protein of SR membranes (11). Tripathy et al. (11) have shown that CaM bound to SR Ca2+ release channel (RYR1) at nanomolar Ca2+ concentrations activates the channel. In contrast, CaM bound to RYR1 at micromolar Ca2+ concentrations inhibits Ca2+ release channel activity. Our studies demonstrate the existence of a single CaM binding site per subunit of RYR1 at both high and low Ca2+ concentrations (6). The affinity of both apoCaM and Ca2+CaM for RYR1 is in the range of 5–50 nM (6, 14, 11). Wagenknecht and colleagues (12) have identified the binding site for CaM in the three-dimensional reconstructions of RYR1, and the approximate location on RYR1 is shown in Fig. 1Go.

RYR1 itself binds Ca2+ in the absence of CaM, creating a complicated picture of the response of this channel to Ca2+ in the presence of CaM. In the absence of CaM, Ca2+ in the 1–300 µM range activates RYR1, but at concentrations of >500 µM it is inhibitory. In the presence of CaM, a biphasic dependence of RYR1 activity on Ca2+ is still seen, except both activation and inhibition take place at lower Ca2+ concentrations. A mutant CaM that does not bind Ca2+ at any of the four binding sites is an activator of the channel at all Ca2+ concentrations (10). The results of Fruen et al. (2) suggest that, in contrast to its interaction with RYR1, apoCaM binds with much lower affinity to RYR2 than to RYR1, and it does not increase RYR2 activity.

The binding sites for both apoCaM and Ca2+CaM on RYR1 appear to be close to amino acids 3630–3637. Bound CaM (either Ca2+-bound or Ca2+-free) can protect this region from either proteolytic cleavage after amino acid 3630 and after amino acid 3637 or modification of cysteine 3635 by either oxidants or N-ethylmaleimide (7). Cysteine 3635 can form a disulfide bond with an unidentified cysteine on an adjacent subunit (6). CaM bound to RYR1 can prevent this oxidation-induced intersubunit cross-linking. Conversely, oxidation blocks CaM binding (14). One interpretation of these findings is that CaM binds at a site of intersubunit contact and, in doing so, could protect the channel from the effects of oxidants (Fig. 4Go), for example, during periods of oxidative stress associated with strenuous exercise.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. CaM binds at a site of subunit-subunit (s-s) contact on RYR1. The CaM binding site on RYR1 contains a cysteine that can be disulfide bonded to a second cysteine on a neighboring subunit (left). Ca2+CaM can protect the site from oxidation, and oxidation can prevent the binding of calmodulin (right).

 

    A role for CaM in E-C coupling?
 Top
 Introduction
 CaM as an intracellular...
 CaM and the voltage-dependent...
 CaM and RYR1
 A role for CaM...
 References
 
There are a number of unanswered questions that limit our ability to define the role of CaM in skeletal and cardiac muscle E-C coupling. Previous studies on DHPR have focused on its activity in transverse-tubule vesicles enriched in DHPR or on the purified form reconstituted in lipid bilayers. Likewise, studies on regulation of RYR have been conducted on SR vesicles enriched in RYR or on the purified protein in lipid bilayers. These studies indicate that both RYR and the DHPR can bind CaM in vitro, but can they both bind CaM in vivo (for example, when the DHPR is physically coupled to RYR1)? In skeletal muscle, only every other RYR1 appears to be coupled to a voltage sensor. Are coupled and uncoupled RYRs modulated by CaM, or is CaM only bound to the uncoupled channels, thereby increasing their sensitivity to Ca2+-triggered opening? Another question is whether the coupling of DHPR to RYR1 alters the ability of the DHPR to bind CaM. As mentioned previously, there is a difference in apoCaM modulation of RYR1 and RYR2, in that apoCaM does not appear to modulate the latter. This raises a question as to what differences in primary structure between RYR1 and RYR2 account for differences in activation of the two RYRs by apoCaM.

In summary, it seems likely that CaM binding to the DHPR and RYR must, in some way, modulate E-C coupling in both cardiac and skeletal muscle. Its role may be to regulate the Ca2+-dependent enhancement and inhibition of activity or, possibly, to prevent or enhance coupling between the DHPR and RYR1. Since CaM plays a wide variety of roles in both development and cell function, it would be difficult to create a CaM knockout animal model to determine the functional role of CaM in regulation of either cardiac or skeletal muscle E-C coupling. Instead, the most likely approach will be to mutate its binding sites on RYR1 and/or the DHPR, express these mutated channels in cells that are deficient in one of these proteins, and assess the functional consequences. This approach will require the further identification of the molecular determinants on RYR and the DHPR involved in both apoCaM and Ca2+CaM binding. If the amino acids needed for apoCaM binding are different from those for Ca2+CaM binding, it may be possible to selectively destroy the binding of one form of CaM without greatly altering the interaction of the other form. This would allow the assessment of the functional contributions of the different forms of CaM.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 CaM as an intracellular...
 CaM and the voltage-dependent...
 CaM and RYR1
 A role for CaM...
 References
 

  1. Franzini-Armstrong C and Protasi F. Ryanodine receptors of striated muscles: a complex channel capable of multiple interactions. Physiol Rev 77: 699–729, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fruen BR, Bardy JM, and Louis CF. Calmodulin activation of skeletal muscle (but not cardiac) ryanodine receptors: modulation by effectors of calcium-induced calcium release (Abstract). Biophys J 74: A61, 1998.
  3. Houdusse A, Silver M, and Cohen C. A model of Ca2+-free calmodulin binding to unconventional myosins reveals how calmodulin acts as a regulatory switch. Structure 4: 1475–1490, 1996.[Medline]
  4. Ikura M, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Zhu G, Klee CB, and Bax A. Solution structure of a calmodulin-target peptide complex by multidimensional NMR. Science 256: 632–638, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kuboniwa H, Tjandra N, Grzesiek S, Ren H, Klee CB, and Bax A. Solution structure of calcium-free calmodulin. Nat Struct Biol 2: 768–776, 1995.[ISI][Medline]
  6. Moore CP, Rodney G, Zhang JZ, Santacruz-Toloza L, Strasburg G, and Hamilton SL. Apocalmodulin and Ca2+ calmodulin bind to the same region on the skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel. Biochemistry 38: 8532–8537, 1999.[Medline]
  7. Moore CP, Zhang JZ, and Hamilton SL. A role for cysteine 3635 of RYR1 in redox modulation and calmodulin binding. J Biol Chem 274: 36831–36834, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Peterson BZ, DeMaria CD, Adelman JP, and Yue DT. Calmodulin is the Ca2+ sensor for Ca2+-dependent inactivation of L-type calcium channels. Neuron 22: 549–558, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
  9. Rhoads AR and Friedberg F. Sequence motifs for calmodulin recognition. FASEB J 11: 331–340, 1997.[Abstract]
  10. Rodney GG, Williams BY, Strasburg GM, Beckingham K, and Hamilton SL. Regulation of RYR1 activity by Ca2+ and calmodulin. Biochemistry 39: 7807–7812, 2000.[Medline]
  11. Tripathy A, Xu L, Mann G, and Meissner G. Calmodulin activation and inhibition of skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor). Biophys J 69: 106–119, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wagenknecht T, Berkowitz J, Grassucci R, Timerman A, and Fleischer S. Localization of calmodulin binding sites on the ryanodine receptor from skeletal muscle by electron microscopy. Biophys J 67: 2286–2295, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Xu L, Tripathy A, Pasek DA, and Meissner G. Potential for pharmacology of ryanodine receptor/calcium release channels. Ann NY Acad Sci 853: 130–148, 1998.[ISI][Medline]
  14. Zhang JZ, Wu Y, Williams BY, Rodney G, Mandel F, Strasburg GM, and Hamilton SL. Oxidation of the skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel alters calmodulin binding. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 276: C46–C53, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Zuhlke RD, Pitt GS, Deisseroth K, Tsien RW, and Reuter H. Calmodulin supports both inactivation and facilitation of L-type calcium channels. Nature 399: 59–62, 1999.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
H. E. D. J. ter Keurs and P. A. Boyden
Calcium and Arrhythmogenesis
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 457 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. P. Gangopadhyay and N. Ikemoto
Role of the Met3534-Ala4271 Region of the Ryanodine Receptor in the Regulation of Ca2+ Release Induced by Calmodulin Binding Domain Peptide
Biophys. J., March 15, 2006; 90(6): 2015 - 2026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
F. Brette, J.-Y. Le Guennec, and I. Findlay
Low-voltage triggering of Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in cardiac muscle cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): C1544 - C1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. A. Anderson, S. Treves, D. Biral, R. Betto, D. Sandona, M. Ronjat, and F. Zorzato
The Novel Skeletal Muscle Sarcoplasmic Reticulum JP-45 Protein: MOLECULAR CLONING, TISSUE DISTRIBUTION, DEVELOPMENTAL EXPRESSION, AND INTERACTION WITH {alpha}1.1 SUBUNIT OF THE VOLTAGE-GATED CALCIUM CHANNEL
J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2003; 278(41): 39987 - 39992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. I. Herzog, C. Liu, S. G. Waxman, and T. R. Cummins
Calmodulin Binds to the C Terminus of Sodium Channels Nav1.4 and Nav1.6 and Differentially Modulates Their Functional Properties
J. Neurosci., September 10, 2003; 23(23): 8261 - 8270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. M. Balog, L. E. Norton, R. A. Bloomquist, R. L. Cornea, D. J. Black, C. F. Louis, D. D. Thomas, and B. R. Fruen
Calmodulin Oxidation and Methionine to Glutamine Substitutions Reveal Methionine Residues Critical for Functional Interaction with Ryanodine Receptor-1
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2003; 278(18): 15615 - 15621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. Yang, L.-S. Song, W.-Z. Zhu, K. Chakir, W. Wang, C. Wu, Y. Wang, R.-P. Xiao, S.R. W. Chen, and H. Cheng
Calmodulin Regulation of Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Cardiac Myocytes
Circ. Res., April 4, 2003; 92(6): 659 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. Fill and J. A. Copello
Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channels
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2002; 82(4): 893 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburg, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Strasburg, G. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online